The case for CMGs as opposed to employing physicians directly

The case for CMGs as opposed to employing physicians directly

August 05, 2020
From the August 2020 issue of HealthCare Business News magazine

By Dr. Kevin Kathrotia

Hospital staffing models for physicians have been hotly debated for years as healthcare costs continue to rise and quality of care comes into question.
As costs to maintain private practices increased due to various policies and legislation under the Obama administration, more physicians began migrating to direct employment by hospitals and were met with open arms by hospitals needing to fill gaps in care, take business from competitors, receive better rates from insurers and end negotiations with contract management groups, among other reasons. However, while hospitals may believe hiring physicians saves money and brings in additional revenue — it can actually do the opposite. While some larger contract management groups have gained a poor reputation for surprise billing and unreasonable contracts, depending on your facility, it actually makes more sense in terms of finances and efficiency to work with CMGs. An important caveat, though, is to make sure you sign with the right one.

How directly employing physicians costs hospitals

Servicing GE/Siemens Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

Numed, a well established company in business since 1975 provides a wide range of service options including time & material service, PM only contracts, full service contracts, labor only contracts & system relocation. Call 800 96 Numed for more info.


According to findings from the American Medical Association, over 25% of U.S. physicians practiced in groups wholly or partly owned by hospitals in 2016, and another 7% were direct hospital employees. This is a significant, and somewhat shocking number of physicians across the country considering multispecialty physician groups lost almost $196,000 per employed physician. In some larger health systems, physician operations are resulting in nine-figure operating losses and a major hit to hospital earnings.

As outlined in the Harvard Business Review, hospitals are losing money on their employed physicians because the accumulated costs of their salary, practice expenses and corporate overhead exceeds the revenue brought in by the practices. This is due, in large part, to not managing these practices effectively through lack of physician organization, standardized staffing and effective scheduling systems — all processes that are provided and streamlined by CMGs.

Benefits of working with a CMG
By uncovering all the inefficiencies and revenue lost by employing physicians, hospitals and healthcare systems are able to establish goals for the physician enterprise that can then be translated into a contract with a CMG to ensure all needs are met within the allocated budget and hospitals are receiving the necessary returns.

Because CMGs negotiate directly with hospitals and healthcare systems, they can ensure the physician staff is sized and located appropriately, and is providing all services necessary to maintain and improve hospital success. Many CMGs provide staffing for inpatient services, specifically specialties such as neonatology, anesthesia and high-risk obstetrics, which ensures that the care provided within the hospital is performed by extensively trained professionals and is of the highest quality. Not to mention, CMGs additionally provide one-stop shopping for hospital admins to eliminate time and money spent on the vetting and hiring process.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment