DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
当前地点:
>
> This Story


注册记数器 to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Business Affairs Homepage

Medical charities do measurable good in the world A look at some organizations bringing goods and services where they are needed most

Merit Medical Systems closes acquisition of Cianna Medical Deal worth $135 million with possible additional incentivized payments

Mike Lobinsky EOS Imaging appoints new President North America

Daniel Kelsey AHRA hires chief executive officer

Clinical wearables – remaining competitive in an evolving market Insights from Ravi Kuppuraj, Business Leader of Connected Sensing Venture for Philips

TIAA Bank acquires $1.5 billion portfolio from GE Capital's HEF business Portfolio of healthcare equipment leases and loans

Driving premium platform valuations for future growth The radiology M&A market is red hot, help investors see the value in your business

Robert Sledd Owens & Minor names board member, chairman and interim president and CEO

Veritas Capital, Evergreen Coast Capital to take athenahealth for $5.7 billion Gives athenahealth stock holders $135 in cash per share

A look into the medical device design process Go behind the scenes to see what factors contribute to the design of new medical devices

Researchers offer guidance for weighing value in radiology

John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
The ultimate goal for any radiologist is to produce an image at the trifecta of lowest cost, highest safety and best quality... but can a valid cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provide insight in reaching these goals?

A team from John Hopkins Medical School is working to answer that question. The group of two radiologist/MBAs and a Medicare policy expert just published their findings on CEAs in an article in the most recent issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.



“Medical imaging is increasingly criticized for its value to patients and the healthcare system. Concern over unnecessary imaging and harmful radiation exposure have prompted the development of various evidence-based guidelines, such as the ACR’s Appropriateness Criteria,” Matthew Alvin, M.D./MBA, radiology resident-physician and one of the authors told HCB News. “Unfortunately, CEAs are difficult to interpret, owing to no standard model for their performance, thus hindering their application.”

The researchers identified four points of consideration based on their study of 80 CEA models. These include:

- Clearly state all direct and indirect costs included in the calculation: There was no consensus among the models about costs. Also, there was not uniform agreement on the definition of costs. For example, in the study review, 87.5 percent of studies had varying levels of details of cost inventory tables.

- Clearly state and align perspective with the intended user: A CEA should identify the intended user and what type of policy decision it should inform. Not all the models defined the same perspective. For example, some models included indirect societal costs, while others did not.

- Measure patient outcomes using Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY): The issue of QALY in radiology has been extensively discussed and examined. This issue is complicated because the downstream disease management is influenced by factors beyond diagnosis.

Compare results with a range of Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) thresholds: This measurement refers to what a patient is willing to pay to achieve a specific health benefit. This factor has a direct relationship to healthcare policy and budget. Current World Health Organization (WHO) measures are widely considered to be inaccurate.

The study noted that such variables could lead to wildly differing assumptions. For example, if one study uses a threshold for defining cost-effectiveness as $100,000/QALY gained but another study uses a threshold of $50,000/QALY gained, then a result for an imaging study of $75,000/QALY gained will be interpreted differently between the two studies. This leaves policymakers wondering which is correct

“Controversy over using the results of CEAs to influence healthcare policy decisions stems partly from a lack of a standardized method for performing them,” said Alvin. “By heeding the recommendations provided in our study, radiologists can improve the validity and transparency of CEAs and help clinicians and policymakers properly apply cost-effectiveness results to patient care.”

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

做广告
提升您的品牌知名度
拍卖+私人销售
获得最好的价格
买设备/配件
找到最低价格
每日新闻
阅读最新信息
目录
浏览所有的DOTmed用户
DOTmed上的伦理
查看我们的伦理计划
金子分开供营商节目
接收PH要求
金子服务经销商节目
接收请求
提供保健服务者
查看所有的HCP(简称医疗保健提供商)的工具
工作/训练
查找/申请工作
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
获取配件报价
最近证明
查看最近通过认证的用户
最近额定
查看最近通过认证的用户
出租中央
租用设备优惠
卖设备/配件
得到最划算
服务技术员论坛
查找帮助和建议
简单的征求建议书
获取设备报价
真正商业展览
查找对设备的服务
对这个站点的通入和用途是受期限和条件我们支配 法律公告 & 保密性通知
物产和业主对 DOTmed.com,公司 Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
版权所有