One-third of breast cancer patients
who undergo traditional surgery are not
aware of surgical options that could
reduce scarring, says study

One-third of breast cancer patients not aware of minimal scarring surgery

June 07, 2019
by John R. Fischer, Senior Reporter
Breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomies or mastectomies may not be aware that they are eligible for other surgical procedures that could minimize scarring.

That’s the consensus arrived at in a new study which found that one-third of patients were not told by their physicians that other options were available to them — options that could mitigate not just the physical appearance of scarring but the psychological impacts associated with it.

“Historically, incisions for cancer were placed directly over the tumor, particularly when the tumor was palpable. Now more cancers are detected by mammography and are non-palpable,” author Dr. Jennifer S. Gass, chief of surgery at Women & Infants Hospital, told HCB News. “Smaller tumors require less extensive tissue removal, thus, resections that may have previously required skin do not today, and therefore incisions may be able to be placed remotely. This adds another level to the task of surgery, just as laparoscopy adds another level of skill to abdominal surgery. Therefore there may be a knowledge gap.”

An estimated 269,000 newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer have been discovered in the U.S. in 2019, with more than 42,000 dead from the disease, according to the National Institutes of Health. More than 3.5 million women in the U.S. are breast cancer survivors, many of whom carry scars from surgical treatments.

Surveying 487 participants who underwent lumpectomies and/or mastectomies, researchers found that 64 percent of lumpectomy-only and 67 percent of mastectomy-only patients were unhappy with the location of their scars. Together, the two groups made up two-thirds of women surveyed.

Sixty-three percent of lumpectomy-only patients admitted to feeling self-conscious, along with 77 percent of mastectomy-only patients. Fifty-seven percent of lumpectomy-only and 66 percent of mastectomy-only patients said they choose not to wear certain clothes that reveal their scars. In addition, 60 and 72 percent, respectively, said they did not realize when they chose their procedures how the scarring would make them feel when undressing.

When asked about their choice of procedures, 32 percent who only had lumpectomies and 35 percent who had only mastectomies said their physicians had not informed them of other options available such as nipple-sparing mastectomies or hidden scar tissue techniques. About six in ten said they would have considered such options had they been made aware of them.

Twenty-six percent of lumpectomy-only participants, in contrast, said they felt minimal or no negative impact from surgical scarring, the same for 14 percent of mastectomy-only respondents.

Gass says a survey of surgeons would be needed to determine why patients were not made aware of all options, but that the current situation illustrates the need to make patients more aware, and encourage them to communicate with their doctors about which surgical routes they can pursue.

“As is often the case, we need to inform patients to be their own advocates, to ask if they are candidates for hidden incision surgery,” said Gass, noting to this reporter that, “your very efforts of media attention to the lay person will drive consumer awareness.”

The survey is the first peer-reviewed, nationwide study to examine the negative relationship between surgical scarring and breast cancer survivorship, and potentially by association, the psychological and physical impacts of scars.

The findings were published in the journal, BMC Cancer.