Over 150 Total Lots Up For Auction at One Location - NY 04/18

Mass. health care cost transparency law underperforming

by Sean Ruck, Contributing Editor | October 20, 2014
Steve Kelly
Health care reform has unquestionably been a challenge to bring about. From legislative wrangling and posturing, to technological glitches, to confusion from the public and providers alike as to what they need to do and what the benefit is to them, it has been a mess. While progress is being made, there's still a long way to go.

At the top of the list when it comes to trying fix the system is getting a clear idea of how much care actually costs, or more precisely, what it should cost for a given procedure.

Most states have made an effort to clarify the cost, but nearly all have literally failed up to this point, with 45 states receiving an F grade from Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute, a non-profit dedicated to tracking and ranking health outcomes. Of the remaining states, Maine and Massachusetts scored a B, while Colorado, Vermont and Virginia squeaked by with C grades.

But it was high-scoring Massachusetts getting some extra scrutiny this month, when the state rolled out its Act 224, which was passed in 2012, but only came into effect on October 1. According to the law, Massachusetts residents can now call a hospital and within 48 hours, get pricing as to what the actual cost of a procedure they need will be.

Reality vs. idealism
The thought was that the availability of the pricing would educate consumers and also help to keep facilities' billing within reason. It was also hoped that informed consumers would help to drive down the cost to the system because they would shop for the best price. The reality has been more sobering.

"My impression is that there is tremendous confusion in implementing the law," Steve Kelly, founder of ELAP services, told DOTmed News. Kelly's firm specializes in tracking and researching health care bills for their clients.

He said Kaiser Permanente conducted an investigation where they created a fictitious patient - a pregnant woman - who was trying to get an idea of the cost of delivering her baby. The price ranges and details she received varied widely. "It was so vague as to be almost meaningless," said Kelly. "In one case, the person that was to provide the information was away for two weeks."

Kelly said a challenge the public faces is that they're being asked to provide the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. But those codes can be difficult to track down. Another challenge is that patients need to get the total cost of the procedure. That means each ancillary care provider involved needs to supply a price. "The amount of time it would take to contact five professional corporations, most people don't have the time or ability to accomplish that," said Kelly.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment